https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462175 Proceedings before the adjudicating authority were stayed because the impugned order was based on the specific grounds urged and the facts of the case, and it was considered improper to permit the adjudicating authority to independently decide the questions already raised before the Court. The directions were treated as confined to the facts of the present matters, and the appeals and applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 May 2025 21:03:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462175 Proceedings before the adjudicating authority were stayed because the impugned order was based on the specific grounds urged and the facts of the case, and it was considered improper to permit the adjudicating authority to independently decide the questions already raised before the Court. The directions were treated as confined to the facts of the present matters, and the appeals and applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462175