<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1489 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462173</link>
    <description>In prosecutions for illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act, a proved demand or solicitation of bribe is sufficient under Section 7; actual receipt is not essential. On the materials noted, the alleged demand, collection through a middleman, and corroborative audio recording established a prima facie case of corruption. Anticipatory bail in such cases remains an exceptional remedy and is ordinarily granted only on a showing of false implication, political motivation, or frivolous prosecution. A general plea to personal liberty under Article 21 did not outweigh the seriousness of the accusation and the prima facie material, so refusal of anticipatory bail was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 18:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1489 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462173</link>
      <description>In prosecutions for illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act, a proved demand or solicitation of bribe is sufficient under Section 7; actual receipt is not essential. On the materials noted, the alleged demand, collection through a middleman, and corroborative audio recording established a prima facie case of corruption. Anticipatory bail in such cases remains an exceptional remedy and is ordinarily granted only on a showing of false implication, political motivation, or frivolous prosecution. A general plea to personal liberty under Article 21 did not outweigh the seriousness of the accusation and the prima facie material, so refusal of anticipatory bail was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>