<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1562 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462162</link>
    <description>The text states that compensation for the death of the claimant&#039;s parents was reassessed on the basis of surrounding circumstances where xerox copies of income-tax returns were not accepted as proof of income, and that such reassessment was not legally improper or excessive. It further notes that deductions for personal and living expenses must be applied on a standardised basis and that future prospects may be added even for self-employed persons. For the death of the younger brother, no further enhancement was shown because compensation had already been increased in line with governing precedent. The enhanced conventional-head amounts were also treated as unexceptionable, and the award was described as just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 19:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1562 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462162</link>
      <description>The text states that compensation for the death of the claimant&#039;s parents was reassessed on the basis of surrounding circumstances where xerox copies of income-tax returns were not accepted as proof of income, and that such reassessment was not legally improper or excessive. It further notes that deductions for personal and living expenses must be applied on a standardised basis and that future prospects may be added even for self-employed persons. For the death of the younger brother, no further enhancement was shown because compensation had already been increased in line with governing precedent. The enhanced conventional-head amounts were also treated as unexceptionable, and the award was described as just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>