<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1443 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462166</link>
    <description>An appeal was dismissed solely because the affidavit supporting the delay condonation application was considered inadequate. The court accepted that an additional affidavit was available and that practical difficulty in uploading it during the video-conference hearing explained its non-filing. As no prejudice would be caused to the respondent, the impugned order was set aside and the delay condonation request was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The substantive questions were not decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 19:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1443 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462166</link>
      <description>An appeal was dismissed solely because the affidavit supporting the delay condonation application was considered inadequate. The court accepted that an additional affidavit was available and that practical difficulty in uploading it during the video-conference hearing explained its non-filing. As no prejudice would be caused to the respondent, the impugned order was set aside and the delay condonation request was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The substantive questions were not decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>