<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1648 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462171</link>
    <description>HC quashed ex-parte tax adjudication orders under KGST Act 2017 due to lack of proper notice and hearing. The court found the petitioner&#039;s non-response was not deliberate and violated natural justice principles. All subsequent enforcement notices were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration with directions to provide fair hearing. The petitioner&#039;s frozen account was immediately defreezing pending reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 19:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1648 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462171</link>
      <description>HC quashed ex-parte tax adjudication orders under KGST Act 2017 due to lack of proper notice and hearing. The court found the petitioner&#039;s non-response was not deliberate and violated natural justice principles. All subsequent enforcement notices were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration with directions to provide fair hearing. The petitioner&#039;s frozen account was immediately defreezing pending reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>