<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 27 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43999</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the classification of goods under Chapter 39, interpretation of Notification No. 37, and application of internationally recognized rules of interpretation. It clarified the exclusion of certain items from Chapter 48, their classification under Chapter 39, and dismissed the appeal challenging the levy of countervailing duty under Tariff Item 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 27 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43999</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the classification of goods under Chapter 39, interpretation of Notification No. 37, and application of internationally recognized rules of interpretation. It clarified the exclusion of certain items from Chapter 48, their classification under Chapter 39, and dismissed the appeal challenging the levy of countervailing duty under Tariff Item 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>