<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Non-Resident Certification Fees: ITAT Upholds No TDS Requirement Under Section 195, Validates Assessee&#039;s Claim</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88866</link>
    <description>ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving TDS u/s 195 and potential disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) related to non-resident certification fees for product market entry in USA and Canada. The Assessing Officer (AO) in scrutiny proceedings accepted the assessee&#039;s contentions and did not make any disallowance. Although the initial processed return under s.143(1)(a) included an inadvertent disallowance, the AO subsequently acknowledged no substantive disallowance was warranted. The tribunal recognized the procedural error and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, effectively confirming no tax deduction was required for the specified payments to non-residents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Non-Resident Certification Fees: ITAT Upholds No TDS Requirement Under Section 195, Validates Assessee&#039;s Claim</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88866</link>
      <description>ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving TDS u/s 195 and potential disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) related to non-resident certification fees for product market entry in USA and Canada. The Assessing Officer (AO) in scrutiny proceedings accepted the assessee&#039;s contentions and did not make any disallowance. Although the initial processed return under s.143(1)(a) included an inadvertent disallowance, the AO subsequently acknowledged no substantive disallowance was warranted. The tribunal recognized the procedural error and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, effectively confirming no tax deduction was required for the specified payments to non-residents.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>