<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1900 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771628</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in serious corruption or conspiracy cases is described as an extraordinary remedy that should not be granted routinely where the investigation is incomplete and custodial interrogation is genuinely sought. The text also explains that cooperation by the accused does not by itself negate the need for custody at a crucial investigative stage, and alleged political bias cannot override prima facie incriminating material. It further states that confessional or disclosure statements recorded during investigation cannot be used as substantive material against a co-accused at the anticipatory bail stage unless the strict conditions for admissibility, relevance, proof, and joint trial are satisfied under the Evidence Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1900 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771628</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in serious corruption or conspiracy cases is described as an extraordinary remedy that should not be granted routinely where the investigation is incomplete and custodial interrogation is genuinely sought. The text also explains that cooperation by the accused does not by itself negate the need for custody at a crucial investigative stage, and alleged political bias cannot override prima facie incriminating material. It further states that confessional or disclosure statements recorded during investigation cannot be used as substantive material against a co-accused at the anticipatory bail stage unless the strict conditions for admissibility, relevance, proof, and joint trial are satisfied under the Evidence Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>