<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1909 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771637</link>
    <description>Special rate of value addition under an area-based exemption notification was to be computed strictly from audited financial records of the preceding year, using the notification&#039;s own formula rather than a Section 4A valuation approach. Excise duty, VAT and other indirect taxes were excluded; free physician samples were not treated as sales for valuation purposes; and octroi, freight, transport and coolie charges formed part of raw-material procurement cost. Work-in-process was also includible in inventory for the computation. On the connected credit issues, the demand for non-utilisation of available CENVAT credit did not survive, while the excess self-credit demand had to be reworked in line with the finally upheld rate; penalties could not remain in their existing form.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1909 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771637</link>
      <description>Special rate of value addition under an area-based exemption notification was to be computed strictly from audited financial records of the preceding year, using the notification&#039;s own formula rather than a Section 4A valuation approach. Excise duty, VAT and other indirect taxes were excluded; free physician samples were not treated as sales for valuation purposes; and octroi, freight, transport and coolie charges formed part of raw-material procurement cost. Work-in-process was also includible in inventory for the computation. On the connected credit issues, the demand for non-utilisation of available CENVAT credit did not survive, while the excess self-credit demand had to be reworked in line with the finally upheld rate; penalties could not remain in their existing form.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>