<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1926 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771654</link>
    <description>The SC addressed a customs duty dispute involving assessment methodology and procedural requirements. The court held that an assessment under Section 17(4) without a mandatory speaking order under Section 17(5) is not final. The refund claims were deemed maintainable, and the matter was remanded for the proper officer to issue a speaking order and reconsider the refund claims in accordance with law, emphasizing procedural safeguards in customs assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1926 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771654</link>
      <description>The SC addressed a customs duty dispute involving assessment methodology and procedural requirements. The court held that an assessment under Section 17(4) without a mandatory speaking order under Section 17(5) is not final. The refund claims were deemed maintainable, and the matter was remanded for the proper officer to issue a speaking order and reconsider the refund claims in accordance with law, emphasizing procedural safeguards in customs assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>