<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43989</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment, dismissing the appeals and confirming that the imported tallow did not meet the exemption conditions under Notification No. 141-Cus./76. The Court emphasized adherence to specified conditions for exemptions, the applicability of Indian Standards for testing, and ruled the amended notification was not retrospective. The appellants were denied the claimed customs duty refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43989</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment, dismissing the appeals and confirming that the imported tallow did not meet the exemption conditions under Notification No. 141-Cus./76. The Court emphasized adherence to specified conditions for exemptions, the applicability of Indian Standards for testing, and ruled the amended notification was not retrospective. The appellants were denied the claimed customs duty refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>