https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771662 Tribunal upheld customs penalties against importers for misdeclaration of goods. The SC found appellants liable for undervaluing imported glass Chatons, rejecting their denial of involvement based on recorded statements and payment records. Penalties under Sections 112 and 114AA were justified. The Tribunal rejected claims of procedural impropriety, confirming the Original Authority's valuation methodology and duty demand. en-us Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771662 Tribunal upheld customs penalties against importers for misdeclaration of goods. The SC found appellants liable for undervaluing imported glass Chatons, rejecting their denial of involvement based on recorded statements and payment records. Penalties under Sections 112 and 114AA were justified. The Tribunal rejected claims of procedural impropriety, confirming the Original Authority's valuation methodology and duty demand. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771662