<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1947 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771675</link>
    <description>Reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior approval of the higher specified authority under section 151(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Approval taken only from the Principal Commissioner was not the prescribed sanction for such reopening, so the defect went to the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148. The reassessment proceedings were therefore unsustainable and the reopening was held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1947 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771675</link>
      <description>Reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior approval of the higher specified authority under section 151(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Approval taken only from the Principal Commissioner was not the prescribed sanction for such reopening, so the defect went to the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148. The reassessment proceedings were therefore unsustainable and the reopening was held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>