<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1955 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771683</link>
    <description>The SC Tribunal addressed two key tax penalty issues during demonetization: (1) cash receipt from an elderly father without prescribed declaration, and (2) interest income from land compensation. The Tribunal deleted penalties under sections 271D and 270A, finding reasonable cause due to genuine hardship, bonafide belief based on conflicting judicial precedents, and absence of malafide intent to evade taxes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1955 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771683</link>
      <description>The SC Tribunal addressed two key tax penalty issues during demonetization: (1) cash receipt from an elderly father without prescribed declaration, and (2) interest income from land compensation. The Tribunal deleted penalties under sections 271D and 270A, finding reasonable cause due to genuine hardship, bonafide belief based on conflicting judicial precedents, and absence of malafide intent to evade taxes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>