<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 76 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43986</link>
    <description>Diluted sulphuric acid remaining after use was held to be only residue, not a product manufactured by the assessee, so it did not qualify as goods attracting central excise duty. The absence of manufacture was decisive: without a manufactured product, no duty could be levied on the retained liquid. The issue was therefore decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee, with no excise duty payable on the post-use residue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 76 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43986</link>
      <description>Diluted sulphuric acid remaining after use was held to be only residue, not a product manufactured by the assessee, so it did not qualify as goods attracting central excise duty. The absence of manufacture was decisive: without a manufactured product, no duty could be levied on the retained liquid. The issue was therefore decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee, with no excise duty payable on the post-use residue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>