<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1968 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771696</link>
    <description>The HC examined a reassessment notice for AY 2015-16 issued under Section 148 on 13.07.2022. Based on SC precedents in Rajeev Bansal and Deepak Steel, the court found the notice invalid due to limitation bar and non-compliance with Section 148A procedural requirements. The Revenue&#039;s own concession before SC that notices issued after 1 April 2021 for AY 2015-16 must be dropped was decisive. Consequently, the HC quashed the notice and related proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:41:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1968 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771696</link>
      <description>The HC examined a reassessment notice for AY 2015-16 issued under Section 148 on 13.07.2022. Based on SC precedents in Rajeev Bansal and Deepak Steel, the court found the notice invalid due to limitation bar and non-compliance with Section 148A procedural requirements. The Revenue&#039;s own concession before SC that notices issued after 1 April 2021 for AY 2015-16 must be dropped was decisive. Consequently, the HC quashed the notice and related proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>