<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43983</link>
    <description>The appeal succeeded, and the self-starter motors were classified under Tariff Item 68 instead of Tariff Item 30. This classification impacted the excise duty obligations of the appellants, leading to the setting aside of previous orders and a requirement for the payment of duty with adjustments to be made following the new classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43983</link>
      <description>The appeal succeeded, and the self-starter motors were classified under Tariff Item 68 instead of Tariff Item 30. This classification impacted the excise duty obligations of the appellants, leading to the setting aside of previous orders and a requirement for the payment of duty with adjustments to be made following the new classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>