https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43979 Differential excise duty on monoblock pumps could not be sustained where the foundational assumption that the pumps contained identifiable electric motors had not been properly examined and no speaking order had been passed; that demand was therefore set aside. The separate finding that rotors and stators were individually dutiable also could not stand because the applicable tariff entry was not determined and the question whether they were independent excisable goods or integral parts of the pump was left unresolved; that limited issue was quashed and remitted for fresh determination in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 04 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:11:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43979 Differential excise duty on monoblock pumps could not be sustained where the foundational assumption that the pumps contained identifiable electric motors had not been properly examined and no speaking order had been passed; that demand was therefore set aside. The separate finding that rotors and stators were individually dutiable also could not stand because the applicable tariff entry was not determined and the question whether they were independent excisable goods or integral parts of the pump was left unresolved; that limited issue was quashed and remitted for fresh determination in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43979