https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462151 The Rajasthan HC denied bail to one accused in a money laundering case involving question paper leaking, emphasizing Section 45 of PMLA's mandatory conditions requiring courts to deny bail unless insufficient evidence exists. The court cited SC precedents establishing these provisions as mandatory. While acknowledging potential trial delays, the HC found the first accused's involvement apparent and role evident, justifying detention up to 1/3rd of prescribed imprisonment for first-time offenders. However, the second accused was granted bail considering his limited role in the alleged crime. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 May 2025 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462151 The Rajasthan HC denied bail to one accused in a money laundering case involving question paper leaking, emphasizing Section 45 of PMLA's mandatory conditions requiring courts to deny bail unless insufficient evidence exists. The court cited SC precedents establishing these provisions as mandatory. While acknowledging potential trial delays, the HC found the first accused's involvement apparent and role evident, justifying detention up to 1/3rd of prescribed imprisonment for first-time offenders. However, the second accused was granted bail considering his limited role in the alleged crime. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462151