<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>University&#039;s Educational Services Exempt from VAT, Incidental Facilities Not Considered Commercial Enterprise Under Statutory Interpretation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88796</link>
    <description>HC determined that a university&#039;s primary educational mission precludes its ancillary activities from being classified as a business for tax purposes. The court ruled that providing canteen facilities to students does not constitute a commercial enterprise, and therefore the university is not liable for VAT on such incidental transactions. The burden of proving a independent business intention rests with the tax department, which failed to establish such intent. Consequently, the tax demand was deemed invalid, and the petition was allowed, setting aside the tribunal&#039;s previous assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:26:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>University&#039;s Educational Services Exempt from VAT, Incidental Facilities Not Considered Commercial Enterprise Under Statutory Interpretation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88796</link>
      <description>HC determined that a university&#039;s primary educational mission precludes its ancillary activities from being classified as a business for tax purposes. The court ruled that providing canteen facilities to students does not constitute a commercial enterprise, and therefore the university is not liable for VAT on such incidental transactions. The burden of proving a independent business intention rests with the tax department, which failed to establish such intent. Consequently, the tax demand was deemed invalid, and the petition was allowed, setting aside the tribunal&#039;s previous assessment order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:26:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>