<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1819 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771547</link>
    <description>Tribunal resolved a service tax dispute concerning transportation of mining rejects. The key finding was that such transportation constitutes a post-mining activity, not a mining service, and therefore not taxable under the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the service tax demand was set aside, along with associated penalties and interest. The decision relied on Board Circular No.F.No.232/2/2006-CX.4 to distinguish between mining and post-mining activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1819 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771547</link>
      <description>Tribunal resolved a service tax dispute concerning transportation of mining rejects. The key finding was that such transportation constitutes a post-mining activity, not a mining service, and therefore not taxable under the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the service tax demand was set aside, along with associated penalties and interest. The decision relied on Board Circular No.F.No.232/2/2006-CX.4 to distinguish between mining and post-mining activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>