<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1838 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771566</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval. Appellant submitted revised payment proposal after deadline, claiming it was mere clarification. Tribunal held email titled &quot;Revised Payment Proposal&quot; clearly constituted modification prohibited under challenge process document. Appellant initially offered 25% upfront payment within 45 days and 75% in 364 days, later attempting to modify second installment to 90 days. CoC properly exercised commercial wisdom approving resolution plan with 73.38% vote share. Adjudicating Authority correctly declined to interfere with CoC&#039;s commercial decision and properly dismissed intervention application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1838 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771566</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval. Appellant submitted revised payment proposal after deadline, claiming it was mere clarification. Tribunal held email titled &quot;Revised Payment Proposal&quot; clearly constituted modification prohibited under challenge process document. Appellant initially offered 25% upfront payment within 45 days and 75% in 364 days, later attempting to modify second installment to 90 days. CoC properly exercised commercial wisdom approving resolution plan with 73.38% vote share. Adjudicating Authority correctly declined to interfere with CoC&#039;s commercial decision and properly dismissed intervention application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>