<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1875 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771603</link>
    <description>Where a return processed under section 143(1) was later rectified under section 154 to accept the returned income, the original appellate confirmation of the addition could not stand because it was passed ex parte on the basis of the earlier intimation and ignored the subsequent rectification. The later rectification order altered the assessment position, so the appellate order confirming the original adjustment was set aside and the assessee succeeded on the effective ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:26:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1875 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771603</link>
      <description>Where a return processed under section 143(1) was later rectified under section 154 to accept the returned income, the original appellate confirmation of the addition could not stand because it was passed ex parte on the basis of the earlier intimation and ignored the subsequent rectification. The later rectification order altered the assessment position, so the appellate order confirming the original adjustment was set aside and the assessee succeeded on the effective ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>