https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43955 The court set aside the remuneration order, ruling that seeking payment for work outside court hours is unjustifiable. It emphasized that duties like preparing inventory and certifying goods are statutory obligations of Magistrates, who are expected to fulfill these responsibilities without overtime charges. Granting extra payment for such tasks was deemed improper and illegal, setting a negative precedent for judicial integrity. The judgment firmly declared that seeking additional remuneration for duties inherent to Magistrates' roles is impermissible and undermines ethical standards. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:58:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43955 The court set aside the remuneration order, ruling that seeking payment for work outside court hours is unjustifiable. It emphasized that duties like preparing inventory and certifying goods are statutory obligations of Magistrates, who are expected to fulfill these responsibilities without overtime charges. Granting extra payment for such tasks was deemed improper and illegal, setting a negative precedent for judicial integrity. The judgment firmly declared that seeking additional remuneration for duties inherent to Magistrates' roles is impermissible and undermines ethical standards. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43955