<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1576 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462144</link>
    <description>Ad interim protection was granted against further coercive action pursuant to show cause notices issued under Rule 96(10) and Rule 89(4)(b) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The petitioners challenged the proceedings on the basis of the omission of those rules and relied on prior judicial restraint in similar matters. As replies to the amended petitions were still to be filed, the court restrained the respondents from taking any further steps on the impugned notice until the next date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 10:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1576 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462144</link>
      <description>Ad interim protection was granted against further coercive action pursuant to show cause notices issued under Rule 96(10) and Rule 89(4)(b) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The petitioners challenged the proceedings on the basis of the omission of those rules and relied on prior judicial restraint in similar matters. As replies to the amended petitions were still to be filed, the court restrained the respondents from taking any further steps on the impugned notice until the next date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>