https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43946 The Court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the requirement for the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) to provide a proper hearing before dismissing an application for stay. The orders of the Collector (Appeals) were quashed due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The Court directed a rehearing of the stay application and instructed respondents not to implement any orders until the matter was resolved. The judgment underscored the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements in administrative decisions under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:28:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43946 The Court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the requirement for the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) to provide a proper hearing before dismissing an application for stay. The orders of the Collector (Appeals) were quashed due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The Court directed a rehearing of the stay application and instructed respondents not to implement any orders until the matter was resolved. The judgment underscored the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements in administrative decisions under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43946