https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14505 The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a demand order because the order was appealable under the statutory scheme and the petitioner had not exhausted the prescribed appellate remedy. The Court explained the distinction between maintainability and entertainability of writs, noting that availability of an efficacious alternative remedy normally militates against entertaining extraordinary constitutional relief unless an exceptional case is shown. Refusal to entertain the writ does not bar the petitioner from pursuing statutory appeal, and the appellate authority should consider the time spent in the writ proceedings. en-us Tue, 27 May 2025 08:35:23 +0530 Tue, 27 May 2025 08:35:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14505 The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a demand order because the order was appealable under the statutory scheme and the petitioner had not exhausted the prescribed appellate remedy. The Court explained the distinction between maintainability and entertainability of writs, noting that availability of an efficacious alternative remedy normally militates against entertaining extraordinary constitutional relief unless an exceptional case is shown. Refusal to entertain the writ does not bar the petitioner from pursuing statutory appeal, and the appellate authority should consider the time spent in the writ proceedings. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Tue, 27 May 2025 08:35:23 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14505