https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88782 ITAT held that the assessee's property transaction did not constitute a short-term capital gain. The tribunal found no evidence of actual property transfer or possession, and the total consideration paid (Rs. 5,00,20,000) exceeded the market valuation (Rs. 4,74,00,000). The unregistered agreement was not considered a valid sale deed. The appellate tribunal set aside the lower authorities' order, directing the AO to delete additions under section 56(vii)(b), effectively allowing the assessee's appeal and rejecting revenue's claims of undervaluation. en-us Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:47 +0530 Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88782 ITAT held that the assessee's property transaction did not constitute a short-term capital gain. The tribunal found no evidence of actual property transfer or possession, and the total consideration paid (Rs. 5,00,20,000) exceeded the market valuation (Rs. 4,74,00,000). The unregistered agreement was not considered a valid sale deed. The appellate tribunal set aside the lower authorities' order, directing the AO to delete additions under section 56(vii)(b), effectively allowing the assessee's appeal and rejecting revenue's claims of undervaluation. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:47 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88782