<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771492</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed appeal challenging suspension and termination of club facility usage rights. Appellants, dependents of club members who continued using facilities after turning 21 without becoming full members, sought interim injunction. Court held that Articles of Association only permitted dependent usage until age 21, after which full membership was required. The practice of allowing continued usage beyond this age contravened the AoA and created unauthorized membership category. Administrator&#039;s corrective action following procedural lapses identified in inquiry report was deemed valid. Natural justice principles were not violated as appellants had no vested rights, being non-members using facilities contrary to governing documents. Single judge&#039;s discretionary refusal of injunction was upheld as reasonable and legally sound.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771492</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed appeal challenging suspension and termination of club facility usage rights. Appellants, dependents of club members who continued using facilities after turning 21 without becoming full members, sought interim injunction. Court held that Articles of Association only permitted dependent usage until age 21, after which full membership was required. The practice of allowing continued usage beyond this age contravened the AoA and created unauthorized membership category. Administrator&#039;s corrective action following procedural lapses identified in inquiry report was deemed valid. Natural justice principles were not violated as appellants had no vested rights, being non-members using facilities contrary to governing documents. Single judge&#039;s discretionary refusal of injunction was upheld as reasonable and legally sound.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>