https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771496 HC analyzed the validity of service of an order-in-original (OIO) under pre-2018 Customs Act. The court found speed post was not a valid mode of service, and the actual communication date was when the petitioner became aware of the order. Consequently, the appeal filed on 07.11.2017 was within limitation. HC quashed the earlier orders and directed the appellate authority to hear the appeal on merits. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771496 HC analyzed the validity of service of an order-in-original (OIO) under pre-2018 Customs Act. The court found speed post was not a valid mode of service, and the actual communication date was when the petitioner became aware of the order. Consequently, the appeal filed on 07.11.2017 was within limitation. HC quashed the earlier orders and directed the appellate authority to hear the appeal on merits. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771496