https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771497 Delhi HC dismissed an appeal challenging seizure of gold and confiscation proceedings. The court condoned delays of 3 and 7 days in filing and re-filing the appeal but found no merit in the substantive claims. The appellant's grievances regarding customs duty payment were properly addressed under Instruction 22/2022-Customs. The court rejected arguments about pending CBI investigations, stating neither the single judge nor appellate court has jurisdiction to monitor such investigations. Both prayers in the underlying writ petition were satisfied, and the appellant was granted liberty to pursue recovery of additional amounts due through appropriate legal channels. en-us Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771497 Delhi HC dismissed an appeal challenging seizure of gold and confiscation proceedings. The court condoned delays of 3 and 7 days in filing and re-filing the appeal but found no merit in the substantive claims. The appellant's grievances regarding customs duty payment were properly addressed under Instruction 22/2022-Customs. The court rejected arguments about pending CBI investigations, stating neither the single judge nor appellate court has jurisdiction to monitor such investigations. Both prayers in the underlying writ petition were satisfied, and the appellant was granted liberty to pursue recovery of additional amounts due through appropriate legal channels. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771497