<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1800 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771528</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to an assessment order alleging violation of natural justice due to notices being sent to incorrect email addresses. The court held that under Rule 127(2)(b)(iii), notices can be validly served at email addresses available on MCA website. Despite petitioner&#039;s claim that notices were sent to wrong email ID, the court found petitioner had received and responded to the notices. Section 292BB precluded objections regarding improper service since petitioner participated in assessment proceedings. The court concluded no violation of natural justice occurred as petitioner had adequate opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1800 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771528</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to an assessment order alleging violation of natural justice due to notices being sent to incorrect email addresses. The court held that under Rule 127(2)(b)(iii), notices can be validly served at email addresses available on MCA website. Despite petitioner&#039;s claim that notices were sent to wrong email ID, the court found petitioner had received and responded to the notices. Section 292BB precluded objections regarding improper service since petitioner participated in assessment proceedings. The court concluded no violation of natural justice occurred as petitioner had adequate opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>