<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43924</link>
    <description>The court granted the petition, setting aside the order rejecting the refund application and instructed the Assistant Collector to review the application with the opportunity for the petitioners to present supporting documents within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted the significance of affording the petitioners a fair chance to substantiate their claim for a refund, emphasizing the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43924</link>
      <description>The court granted the petition, setting aside the order rejecting the refund application and instructed the Assistant Collector to review the application with the opportunity for the petitioners to present supporting documents within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted the significance of affording the petitioners a fair chance to substantiate their claim for a refund, emphasizing the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>