https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462122 The High Court could not decide the appeals on merits while expressly declining to determine the appellants' objection that the first and second respondents' appeals were not maintainable. The Supreme Court quashed the judgment to that extent, holding that the maintainability issue had to be decided first before any merits determination or remand could stand. The company appeals were restored to the High Court, which was directed to first rule on maintainability, with all rival contentions left open. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 May 2025 19:07:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462122 The High Court could not decide the appeals on merits while expressly declining to determine the appellants' objection that the first and second respondents' appeals were not maintainable. The Supreme Court quashed the judgment to that extent, holding that the maintainability issue had to be decided first before any merits determination or remand could stand. The company appeals were restored to the High Court, which was directed to first rule on maintainability, with all rival contentions left open. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462122