https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43921 The appeal challenging the Customs, Excise, and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 25,00,000 for hearing was dismissed. The court held that the Tribunal's decision did not warrant interference, emphasizing that the lack of detailed reasons for considering financial hardship did not render the order illegal. The court cautioned the Tribunal against mechanically dismissing appeals for non-compliance with pre-deposit conditions and allowed the appellant to raise financial difficulties at a later stage for assessment. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, highlighting the need for the Tribunal to fairly consider financial hardship pleas before dismissing appeals for non-compliance. en-us Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:44:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43921 The appeal challenging the Customs, Excise, and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 25,00,000 for hearing was dismissed. The court held that the Tribunal's decision did not warrant interference, emphasizing that the lack of detailed reasons for considering financial hardship did not render the order illegal. The court cautioned the Tribunal against mechanically dismissing appeals for non-compliance with pre-deposit conditions and allowed the appellant to raise financial difficulties at a later stage for assessment. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, highlighting the need for the Tribunal to fairly consider financial hardship pleas before dismissing appeals for non-compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43921