<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1199 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462120</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the lower court&#039;s ruling, finding that the defendant&#039;s actions constituted a breach of contract. The court determined that the essential elements of contractual obligation were met, and the plaintiff was entitled to damages. The decision emphasized the importance of good faith and fair dealing in contractual relationships, ultimately ruling in favor of the plaintiff and awarding compensatory relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 17:27:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1199 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462120</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the lower court&#039;s ruling, finding that the defendant&#039;s actions constituted a breach of contract. The court determined that the essential elements of contractual obligation were met, and the plaintiff was entitled to damages. The decision emphasized the importance of good faith and fair dealing in contractual relationships, ultimately ruling in favor of the plaintiff and awarding compensatory relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>