<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CVC issues fresh guidelines on determining &#039;vigilance angle&#039; in misconduct by govt employees</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=44748</link>
    <description>The CVC has issued a consolidated master circular defining vigilance angle, superseding earlier guidance and prescribing that certain misconducts-such as disproportionate assets, misappropriation, forgery, acceptance of gratification, and sector specific irregularities in banks and insurance companies-will ordinarily indicate a vigilance angle. The circular lists bank examples (fictitious accounts, misappropriation, falsification, wrongful disclosure, false claims, actions causing loss) and insurance examples (inflated claims, bad risks, collusion, bad underwriting), and emphasizes that lack of vigilance angle does not preclude disciplinary action under service rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 16:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 16:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CVC issues fresh guidelines on determining &#039;vigilance angle&#039; in misconduct by govt employees</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=44748</link>
      <description>The CVC has issued a consolidated master circular defining vigilance angle, superseding earlier guidance and prescribing that certain misconducts-such as disproportionate assets, misappropriation, forgery, acceptance of gratification, and sector specific irregularities in banks and insurance companies-will ordinarily indicate a vigilance angle. The circular lists bank examples (fictitious accounts, misappropriation, falsification, wrongful disclosure, false claims, actions causing loss) and insurance examples (inflated claims, bad risks, collusion, bad underwriting), and emphasizes that lack of vigilance angle does not preclude disciplinary action under service rules.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 16:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=44748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>