<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Return Scrutiny Invalidated: Prior Approval Mandatory for Assessment Proceedings Under Instruction No. 5/2017</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88745</link>
    <description>HC held that picking up a tax return for scrutiny without prior approval from PCIT/PDIT/CIT/DIT violates procedural guidelines. While tax authorities can select returns for scrutiny based on verifiable tax evasion information under Instruction No. 5/2017, the critical procedural requirement of obtaining jurisdictional authority&#039;s approval was not met in this case. The absence of mandatory approval rendered the assessment order invalid, and ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment for AY 2016-17 was upheld as legally sound and procedurally correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 08:52:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 08:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Return Scrutiny Invalidated: Prior Approval Mandatory for Assessment Proceedings Under Instruction No. 5/2017</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88745</link>
      <description>HC held that picking up a tax return for scrutiny without prior approval from PCIT/PDIT/CIT/DIT violates procedural guidelines. While tax authorities can select returns for scrutiny based on verifiable tax evasion information under Instruction No. 5/2017, the critical procedural requirement of obtaining jurisdictional authority&#039;s approval was not met in this case. The absence of mandatory approval rendered the assessment order invalid, and ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment for AY 2016-17 was upheld as legally sound and procedurally correct.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 08:52:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>