https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43904 A final adjudication was set aside because the Assistant Collector passed the order before the thirty-day reply period in the show cause notice had expired and without a fair and effective hearing, amounting to breach of natural justice. The record also disclosed an infirmity in the alleged representation on behalf of the petitioner, later acknowledged as an oversight. As the consequential communication by the Superintendent rested entirely on the validity of the primary order, it could not survive once the main adjudication was found procedurally unsustainable. The matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after issuing a fresh notice and granting proper opportunity. en-us Mon, 31 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:43:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43904 A final adjudication was set aside because the Assistant Collector passed the order before the thirty-day reply period in the show cause notice had expired and without a fair and effective hearing, amounting to breach of natural justice. The record also disclosed an infirmity in the alleged representation on behalf of the petitioner, later acknowledged as an oversight. As the consequential communication by the Superintendent rested entirely on the validity of the primary order, it could not survive once the main adjudication was found procedurally unsustainable. The matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after issuing a fresh notice and granting proper opportunity. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43904