<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1718 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771446</link>
    <description>The HC examined the validity of an income tax return scrutiny for AY 2016-17. The court found the selection invalid due to lack of prior administrative approval as mandated by CBDT Instruction No. 5/2017. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, ruling that procedural non-compliance renders the assessment proceedings unsustainable. The assessment order was set aside, emphasizing strict adherence to prescribed scrutiny selection guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1718 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771446</link>
      <description>The HC examined the validity of an income tax return scrutiny for AY 2016-17. The court found the selection invalid due to lack of prior administrative approval as mandated by CBDT Instruction No. 5/2017. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, ruling that procedural non-compliance renders the assessment proceedings unsustainable. The assessment order was set aside, emphasizing strict adherence to prescribed scrutiny selection guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>