<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43900</link>
    <description>Notification No. 146/74 granting rebate on sugar produced in excess of the five-year average was construed to require the percentage slabs to be applied to the excess production itself, not to the average production base. The Court held that the notification&#039;s language and graded incentive structure supported this reading, because the rebate was intended to increase as excess output moved into higher slabs. The contrary interpretation was rejected, and the exemption notification was therefore interpreted in favour of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 134 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43900</link>
      <description>Notification No. 146/74 granting rebate on sugar produced in excess of the five-year average was construed to require the percentage slabs to be applied to the excess production itself, not to the average production base. The Court held that the notification&#039;s language and graded incentive structure supported this reading, because the rebate was intended to increase as excess output moved into higher slabs. The contrary interpretation was rejected, and the exemption notification was therefore interpreted in favour of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>