https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43893 Writ interference with a Tribunal's order on pre-deposit was held unwarranted where the Tribunal had already considered the age and depreciation of the equipment, the petitioner's claimed financial hardship, and had granted substantial relief by reducing the pre-deposit and regulating recovery during the appeal. The Court found no clear legal or factual error and noted that the cited authorities were distinguishable on their facts. The governing principle is that, when the appellate forum has applied its mind to the relevant contentions and granted meaningful concession, supervisory writ jurisdiction should not be used to reappraise the pre-deposit decision. en-us Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:06:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43893 Writ interference with a Tribunal's order on pre-deposit was held unwarranted where the Tribunal had already considered the age and depreciation of the equipment, the petitioner's claimed financial hardship, and had granted substantial relief by reducing the pre-deposit and regulating recovery during the appeal. The Court found no clear legal or factual error and noted that the cited authorities were distinguishable on their facts. The governing principle is that, when the appellate forum has applied its mind to the relevant contentions and granted meaningful concession, supervisory writ jurisdiction should not be used to reappraise the pre-deposit decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43893