<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 582 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462115</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was found inapplicable where the assessee reversed the Cenvat credit relatable to sugar cess before the show cause notice was issued. The Tribunal treated the credit availment as a misinterpretation of the credit position rather than conduct justifying mandatory penalty, and held that the facts did not support invocation of Section 11AC. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was therefore rejected, and the penalty was not leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 13:09:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 582 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462115</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was found inapplicable where the assessee reversed the Cenvat credit relatable to sugar cess before the show cause notice was issued. The Tribunal treated the credit availment as a misinterpretation of the credit position rather than conduct justifying mandatory penalty, and held that the facts did not support invocation of Section 11AC. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was therefore rejected, and the penalty was not leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>