<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1623 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771351</link>
    <description>The SC examined the seizure of gold bars under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found no evidence of foreign origin and ruled against the Revenue&#039;s claim. The gold bars were ordered released, penalties were quashed, and the transportation vehicle was to be returned. The Revenue failed to establish reasonable belief for seizure, thereby shifting the burden of proof back to the authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:00:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1623 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771351</link>
      <description>The SC examined the seizure of gold bars under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found no evidence of foreign origin and ruled against the Revenue&#039;s claim. The gold bars were ordered released, penalties were quashed, and the transportation vehicle was to be returned. The Revenue failed to establish reasonable belief for seizure, thereby shifting the burden of proof back to the authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>