<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1629 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771357</link>
    <description>The SC condoned a 1607-day delay in filing a customs appeal, considering COVID-19 pandemic disruptions and the Appellant&#039;s partner&#039;s medical conditions as sufficient cause. The court restored the appeal to CESTAT, imposed Rs. 5 lakhs in costs, and directed expeditious adjudication on merits, balancing procedural fairness with substantive justice under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:00:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1629 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771357</link>
      <description>The SC condoned a 1607-day delay in filing a customs appeal, considering COVID-19 pandemic disruptions and the Appellant&#039;s partner&#039;s medical conditions as sufficient cause. The court restored the appeal to CESTAT, imposed Rs. 5 lakhs in costs, and directed expeditious adjudication on merits, balancing procedural fairness with substantive justice under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>