https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771362 Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC was applied to clarify that a later reversal or modification of legal view in another case, by itself, is not a ground for review. The prior co-equal three-Judge Bench decision was treated as binding, and the later order relied upon was noted not to have considered that earlier authority. On that basis, liberty to seek review was declined and the review petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2026 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771362 Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC was applied to clarify that a later reversal or modification of legal view in another case, by itself, is not a ground for review. The prior co-equal three-Judge Bench decision was treated as binding, and the later order relied upon was noted not to have considered that earlier authority. On that basis, liberty to seek review was declined and the review petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771362