<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1660 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771388</link>
    <description>Tribunal ruled on surcharge rate for private discretionary trust. Income of Rs. 1.18 crore triggered 15% surcharge, not 37% as initially assessed by CPC. Relying on ITAT Special Bench precedent, the Tribunal directed recomputation of tax, holding that surcharge must align with Finance Act slab rates. CPC&#039;s section 143(1) intimation was deemed incorrect, and the assessment was ordered to be modified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:00:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1660 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771388</link>
      <description>Tribunal ruled on surcharge rate for private discretionary trust. Income of Rs. 1.18 crore triggered 15% surcharge, not 37% as initially assessed by CPC. Relying on ITAT Special Bench precedent, the Tribunal directed recomputation of tax, holding that surcharge must align with Finance Act slab rates. CPC&#039;s section 143(1) intimation was deemed incorrect, and the assessment was ordered to be modified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>