<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1670 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771398</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that assessment proceedings for AY 2005-06 were time-barred under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act. The AO failed to pass a consequential order within the prescribed statutory period, resulting in the petitioner&#039;s original return being deemed accepted. The HC directed the Revenue to process the refund claim with applicable interest within twelve weeks, emphasizing the mandatory nature of statutory time limits in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 18:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1670 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771398</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that assessment proceedings for AY 2005-06 were time-barred under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act. The AO failed to pass a consequential order within the prescribed statutory period, resulting in the petitioner&#039;s original return being deemed accepted. The HC directed the Revenue to process the refund claim with applicable interest within twelve weeks, emphasizing the mandatory nature of statutory time limits in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>