<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 1674 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771402</link>
    <description>The SC invalidated a GST assessment order due to absence of the assessing officer&#039;s signature and Document Identification Number (DIN). The court quashed the assessment order and related bank attachment, directing tax authorities to conduct a fresh assessment following proper procedural requirements. The ruling emphasizes procedural compliance and authentication in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 1674 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771402</link>
      <description>The SC invalidated a GST assessment order due to absence of the assessing officer&#039;s signature and Document Identification Number (DIN). The court quashed the assessment order and related bank attachment, directing tax authorities to conduct a fresh assessment following proper procedural requirements. The ruling emphasizes procedural compliance and authentication in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>