https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771409 Duplicated demand components and arithmetical errors in two Orders-in-Original required correction insofar as they related to the petitioner, and the correction was to be made only after affording a personal hearing. The respondent did not dispute the existence of the errors, so the orders had to be reconsidered qua the petitioner with notice sent to the specified contact details. The corrected order was to be communicated within thirty days, after which the petitioner could pursue further remedies in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jun 2025 15:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771409 Duplicated demand components and arithmetical errors in two Orders-in-Original required correction insofar as they related to the petitioner, and the correction was to be made only after affording a personal hearing. The respondent did not dispute the existence of the errors, so the orders had to be reconsidered qua the petitioner with notice sent to the specified contact details. The corrected order was to be communicated within thirty days, after which the petitioner could pursue further remedies in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=771409